
Dr. Rudolph Matas - pioneer of vascular surgery - in Charity Hospital's "Bullpen"
One of the most common questions I receive (especially now) is, “what kind of doctor do you want to be?”
Well I have finally narrowed this choice down. General Surgery or Urology. I grew up in a Urologist’s household and thus was exposed to the surgical lifestyle from a young age. I then began medical school with the much anticipated Gross Anatomy course. I absolutely loved learning about the physical makeup of the body. I enjoyed dissecting with my hands and exploring this amazing and miraculous machine that comprises our physical being. I then went through my 3rd year working in the hospitals and clinics in various parts of medicine with an open mind hoping to learn what I could from every specialty and considering that specialty as a career. I enjoyed most of them and had thoughts at times that, “I could see myself doing this.” However when I began work on my surgery rotation I truly fell in love. I enjoyed almost every aspect of what we did. Many days I worked from 4am – 7pm or even later and yet I came home excited and wanting to read more about the surgeries we saw or what we would do the next day. I loved being able to know there was an anatomic problem with a patient, perform the surgery and cure the problem. I enjoyed working with the operating team comprised of people from all different training levels and backgrounds to ensure a successful operation.
It also seems to me that there are few other fields than surgery that cause patients as much emotional distress. I consider it a great honor and privilege to be there for them from beginning to end to comfort them and their loved ones through that time no matter what the outcome. I think the time that I enjoyed the most on surgery was talking to a patient right before they would be taken to the operating room, laying a hand on them and ensuring them that we were going to take care of them.
Here’s a quick breakdown of general surgery vs. urology:
A general surgeon, as the name implies, is a surgeon who is trained and qualified to operate in many areas throughout the body. As a rule general surgeons perform: thyroidectomies, parathyroidectomies, breast surgery and abdominal surgeries (gallbladder, stomach, spleen, small intestine, large intestine, liver, appendix, as well as hernias). Many also do skin cancer excisions and some will do basic chest surgeries (heart, lung, etc.). Some rural general surgeons even find themselves performing basic Urologic and Gynecologic surgeries as well. It all sounds very romantic to be able to operate on virtually any part of the body and to be the one-stop-shop for all of your surgical needs. However, this field has been hit hard in every which way. Surgeons have very high malpractice insurance rates. Since a general surgeon receives virtually all of his income from operating this leaves lots of opportunity for things to go wrong and law suits to be filed. And just like car insurance, even if you did nothing wrong, the rates still go up. They often work grueling hours because they are called for any surgical emergency and it is not uncommon to have to operate at any hour of the day or night. They have also been particularly affected by decreasing reimbursements to the point where many communities are left without surgeons at all. In addition, in practice many general surgeons do not get the luxury of practicing the large litany of surgeries they were trained to do because of extreme sub-specialization as well as a host of political, economical and legal reasons. Why would a hospital want a general surgeon to manage the ventilator settings in the ICU when they hired a Pulmonary Critical Care person to do that? Why should they want the general surgeon to do breast cancer surgeries when they just hired a dedicated breast surgeon to do that?
The present paints a difficult picture for general surgeons on all fronts – long hours, minimal pay, huge liability and a physically demanding job.
A urologist focuses his attention on issues such as: the urinary system (kidneys, ureters and bladder) as well as the male reproductive system. The main difference for me here is that urologists balance their operative time with an office practice where they see patients with issues such as: kidney cancer, prostate cancer, bladder cancer, erectile dysfunction, urinary tract infections, male infertility, kidney stones. The office practice is extremely attractive to me. I really enjoy building a relationship with my patients and being able to see them for years and then take care of their family members. (In contrast, general surgeons generally see you once or twice before they operate and a few times afterwards. It’s uncommon to have long term relationships with patients.) Urologists also get to perform a number of in-office procedures and do not spend all of their procedure time in the operating room. This creates a nice balance of work. They have much fewer emergencies and thus have more control of their personal time. The main drawback to me is that I worry that focusing on such a more narrow field of medicine may bring me out of touch with other aspects of medicine.
I’ll keep you guys updated on which path I choose. Both are great fields and I would enjoy working in either. It’s more the quality of life issues that I’m deciding on. Both fields lend themselves to surgical volunteerism both local and abroad. However, a general surgeon is able to offer more diverse services.
Until then, I leave you with a quote from one of my professors, “There are worse decisions to make in life than deciding between two equally fulfilling and challenging fields of medicine” – Dr. Jeffrey Wiese